| Specifications and Layout Considerations | ||
 |
||
| Click here for a printable version of the illustration above. |
||
| Tolerances | ||
It is critical that specifications call for a "minimum 1/2-inch depth to a maximum of 5/8-inch depth," rather than calling for a 1/2-inch deep cut with a 1/8-inch tolerance. 1/8-inch equates to 25% of the milled depth. If a highway does not demand a minimum 1/2-inch depth, contractors will mill shallow 3/8-inch cuts, which will not alert truck drivers and other vehicles drifting off the road. Likewise, specifications should call for minimum dimensions of 7-inches in the direction of travel. Specifications must allow for some tolerance, however, highway authorities should not accept any cuts less than 7-inches in the direction of travel. Large radius tires, such as truck tires, will simply straddle narrower cuts and they will not generate sufficient noise and vibration. |
||
Back to top |
||
| Offset from the Edge Line | ||
Highway authorities have varied the offset of the rumble strips from the edge line. Some states have placed the rumble strips directly on the edge line (and later painted through the cuts), while others have offset the rumble strips anywhere from 4 to 18-inches. Designers should consider safety, maintenance, and shoulder use concerns in determining the offset of the rumble strips from the edge line. The closer the rumble strips are to the edge line, the sooner they will alert a drifting driver, allowing him more time to recover. From a construction standpoint, the only consideration regarding offset is in those instances where the rumble strips are placed on a narrow shoulder adjacent to a guardrail or a concrete barrier. In these instances, designers need to make sure they have allowed enough room for a rumble strip mill to work between the location of the cut and any vertical barrier (nearly all mills can fit in areas of 5-feet or more). The air turbulence from the passing traffic keeps the rumble strips blown clear from a build up of debris, sand, or water. This air turbulence decreases as the rumble strips are moved further off the edge line, thus allowing the rumble strips to fill up and become ineffective. Also, rumble strips placed close to or on the edge line maximizes the available usable shoulder. |
||
Back to top |
||
| "Continuous" vs. "Skip Pattern" Layout Designs | ||
Most states have adopted a continuous layout design for shoulder rumble strips. This has provided states with a consistent and effective layout design, which specifies that the rumble strips be placed on continuous 1-foot centers along the edge line of the shoulder. An alternative design, however, has become increasingly popular in recent years. The "skip" pattern uses the same 7" x 16" x 1/2" cuts placed on 1-foot centers, but with an occasional gap. Below is an example of a “skip pattern” or “gap” design”: |
||
|
||
Most state highway authorities that have tested both designs have gone on to use the skip pattern rumble strip. State engineers have cited three reasons for their preference for the skip pattern:
|
||
Back to top |
||
| Clean Up Specifications | ||
While the vast majority of highways (over 90%) allow contractors to waste the milling debris over the shoulder's edge, some states require that contractors pick up the debris and haul it off the project to an appropriate dumpsite. Due to the considerable cost of removing the debris from the job site, it is critical that the specifications make clear how the clean up of the debris is to be handled. Specifications which leave it up to the "engineer's discretion" invariably result in delayed bid dates and addendums until the engineer makes the requirements clear. If the state does not wish to have contractors sweep the debris over the shoulder's edge, they should state this clearly, such as:
|
||
Back to top |
